International communism: a British invention?

Key Markets update for Monday, 13 January 2025

The above heading is the title of Richard Poe's recent book. While I haven't yet had the chance to read it, Poe recently gave an extensive interview on my friend @CryptoRich's podcast adding much compelling corroboration to my own claim that "all roads lead to London." For students of history I could not recommend this interview highly enough, particularly because the lessons of history that Poe offers are extremely relevant to current events in the world. The full interview is available on X at the following link: https://x.com/CryptoRichYT/status/1878543873040875783

Poe sheds light on the way Britain has been able to bring the U.S. into its orbit and exert great influence over the American foreign policy. One example was the creation of the League of Nations in the aftermath of World War I. In 1918 and 1919 there was a lively debate in the U.S. about whether it should become a signatory of the Versailles Treaty or not. The idea was extremely unpopular because it entailed the U.S. becoming a member of the League of Nations. The League of Nations was entirely the brainchild of the British ruling establishment.

British gifts that keep on giving: war, the League of Nations, the Fed, income tax, IRS…

As such, however, it could not be sold to the American people. So already in 1916 the British asked President Woodrow Wilson's closest advisor, Col. Edward House, to persuade Wilson to adopt and promote the League of Nations initiative as his own. Wilson's White House was thoroughly infiltrated by British agents and Col. House was one of them. He maintained extensive correspondence with the British Foreign Office and was in close contact with Sir William Wiseman. Wiseman was the head of British intelligence (same organization as today's MI6) and a high level banker. In 1929, he became a general partner at Kuhn, Loeb Co. in New York.

The rest was history: the League of Nations was created and to this day history records that it was Woodrow Wilson's brainchild and his own life's work. The reality is very different: wittingly or unwittingly (most likely the latter), Wilson did the bidding of the British government, not only by creating the League of Nations but also entering World War I, signing the Federal Reserve act, introducing the income tax (for the first time in U.S. history) and creating the IRS - all powerful additions to the development of democracy and freedom.

The magic of making: Communist international

In his podcast interview, Poe also explains his book's title: how the British invented Communism. The story starts with the French revolution in 1789. Apparently, the French revolutionary forces were thoroughly infiltrated by British secret services. According to Poe, "it's undeniable that Brits were in control of the French revolutionary movement and likewise they were in Russia over 100 years later."

Some of the evidence for this came from the letters from Marquis de Lafayette and from Thomas Jefferson who was in France at the time as U.S. Ambassador in Paris. One of the revolutionary factions backed by the British was the "Conspiracy of Equals," led by one Francois Noel (Gracchus) Babeuf whom both Marx and Engels recognized as the founder of the Communist movement. The leader of the Communist revolution in Russia was Leon Trotsky who was also a British agent.

How is all this relevant to today's events? Well, for one thing, there's no evidence that the British influence in world affairs significantly waned up until only a few years ago. British hand in the Middle East and Ukraine has become difficult to hide today and much of what is unfolding in those regions and elsewhere in the world is the outcome of geopolitical arrangements created by the British governments in the past with continuing deep involvement by the British - not as the loyal junior partner in their "special relationship" with the U.S. but as the ringleader.

There's a good deal of evidence that Ukraine's acting president, Volodymyr Zelensky is himself a British Agent. In July 2003, former U.S. Marine and U.N. weapons inspector Scott Ritter published a documentary film "Agent Zelensky." Ritter's exact hypothesis is that Zelensky is a British agent. Unfortunately, his film was very quickly and thoroughly scrubbed from the internet which, in itself adds credibility to the hypothesis. In the future, I'm sure that the film will re-emerge again, but for now, only this audio recording of the film has survived.

“The end of our hegemony”

Today, the world is still dealing with the mess left behind by the British Empire - the mess which the British ruling establishment can't seem to let go of, but is instead trying to recycle in order to somehow scotch up what's left of their hegemony and prestige in the world. Fortunately for the rest of us, their efforts seem to be faltering, which may have induced British former Prime Minister Boris Johnson to vent his frustration in a vulgar post aimed at Vladimir Putin.

Recall, a few months ago Johnson warned that the fall of Ukraine would be "the end of our hegemony" which points to the source of his frustration. Hopefully, the end of British hegemony will also usher the end of Communism and color revolutions around the world and the start of a different page of human history with less war, less terror, less plunder, less human trafficking, less deviance, less monstrous abuse of children and more peace, more constructive international cooperation, more free trade and more prosperity.

Of course, I'm not laying the blame for the ills of the World at the feet of the British people, but at the degenerate, dynastic, in-bred, parasitic "elites" which have managed to entrench themselves around the levers of power in British society for many generations.

To learn more about TrendCompass reports please check our main TrendCompass web page. We encourage you to also have a read through our TrendCompass User Manual page.

Trading signals for Key Markets, 13 Jan. 2025

With yesterday’s closing prices we have the following signals: